<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>JG Etc.  - Latest Comments in Open Data</title><link>http://jgetc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://jgetc.disqus.com/open_data/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:48:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Open Data</title><link>http://www.jamesgross.com/open-data/#comment-1686289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the idea would be that you would have a certain amount of control over your data that you could do what you want with. I could even see the day when an ad comes with a little statement, "why you are seeing this ad" that when clicked could give you your activity stream for why that ad is being served to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamesgross</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:48:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Data</title><link>http://www.jamesgross.com/open-data/#comment-1666584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Noah: relevance.  Ads help subsidize a lot of the "free" good content we know and love - more relevance and value exchanged for small amounts of attention is one of the better things we can hope for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bosko</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:26:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Data</title><link>http://www.jamesgross.com/open-data/#comment-1584808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The idea makes sense, but I guess my question is why is that good for users? I mean it's great for the sites/ad world, but why does it make anyone's life better for them to share their behavior data (even if it's anonymous)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Noah Brier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:44:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>